|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 17 post(s) |

Le Creed
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
7
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 22:52:00 -
[1] - Quote
GM Grimmi wrote:Greetings pilots, ...
You realize this is Eve Online correct? You know, a game that is famous for allowing players to employ mallicious trickery agaInst others without retribution.
Just saying. |

Le Creed
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
11
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 23:07:00 -
[2] - Quote
Quote:Here is the very wording of the EULA ". No player may use the character name of another player to impersonate or falsely represent his or her identity." I have not done that.
If you could point to where I used the name of another player to impersonate my identity, please show me. My ingame character name is listed as the contract issuer and all it takes is to click on the contract to see that I am in no way assocated with SOMER. It isn't even that, I never personally claimed be associated with SOMER, and that is the only possible statement in the EULA for you to base this infraction on.
Have a nice day,
Quote:I would also like to note that the impersonation section of the EULA applies only to character names as stated in the previous sections of the EULA. I am not claiming another players name as my own and therefore, I am not in violation of the EULA.
Quote:Hello,
Our apologies for the delay in getting back to you.
As stated in the previous support ticket, creating contracts titled with "Somer Blink" to specific bilnk winners who may be expecting a contract from Somer Blink implies that you, the contract issuer, have a connection to the corporation. If you only meant to sell ships to Somer Blink winners then your contracts should have been titled "I'm selling ships to Somer Blink winners" or something of that sort and that would be perfectly fine and within game mechanics. While the EULA may have not specified that "one cannot use the corporation name of another corporation as contract titles", doing so with contract names that suggest a relation to the well known lottery corporation and with a clear attempt to mislead or trick players into thinking that they were actually accepting a contract from a representative of that corporation is deemed as impersonation and impersonation is in violation of our rules.
I'm sorry but in this case we will not be retracting the warning you received and as a valued customer, we want to also urge you to please take care to avoid any such violations in the future, as repeated violations may eventually lead to a game ban. As a final conclusion has been reached by two Senior Game Masters, both GM Nythanos and myself and as we've reached to a point where we can only reiterate what has already been stated, this support ticket will be closed.
Best regards, Senior GM Banton CCP Customer Support | EVE Online | DUST 514
Here is a petition I filed a several months back and the GM response. (I created a contract to a winner of Somer Blink for his winning ship (a malediction) in return for 1b isk. )
The GM even states in the petition that my violation wasn't specifically in the EULA ( While the EULA may have not specified that "one cannot use the corporation name of another corporation as contract titles") but they were going to infract me anyways.
So I suggest you guys prepare yourselves as they will extrapolate on this new wording of the EULA to infract even harsher punishments. |

Le Creed
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
11
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 23:43:00 -
[3] - Quote
Rhes wrote:Players in NPC corporations shouldn't be allowed to post on the forums. They don't have permission to speak for those corps.
Welp. This also means that players in NPC corporations shouldn't be allowed to play at all because their actions in game reflect upon the NPCs pertaining to their corporation and are therefore in violation of the new TOS/EULA. |

Le Creed
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
11
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 00:32:00 -
[4] - Quote
John Ryuk wrote:Most of you whine way to much,
For 1. It's THERE GAME, they can do whatever they want whenever they want.
2. They CAN ban you for cussing, but since I have been around since 2005 and cuss more in local chats than a sailor, they use GM Discreation, Meaning if you sit and try and say your ODIN there gonna laugh at that report, but if you say your GM or DEV so and so, it's ban hammer time.
This is to cut down on scammers, and I'm for it. It all comes down to common sense, which most of you don't seem to have because your over thinking this.
Use some common sense.
Keeping it real since 1886 Reported for impersonating Concord. |

Le Creed
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
12
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 00:38:00 -
[5] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:John Ryuk wrote:This is to cut down on scammers, and I'm for it. Yeah !!
Those pesky scammers and griefers are ruining my mining operation!
DOWN WITH SCAMMERS~~~ |

Le Creed
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
12
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 00:54:00 -
[6] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Le Creed wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:John Ryuk wrote:This is to cut down on scammers, and I'm for it. Yeah !! Those pesky scammers and griefers are ruining my mining operation! DOWN WITH SCAMMERS~~~ Mining operation where you whip your slaves back and forth right?
It's the slaves that are doing the heavy lifting, yes. But I can't have them being scammed out of the minerals they are harvesting. It hurts my bottom line! |

Le Creed
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
12
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 01:18:00 -
[7] - Quote
John Ryuk wrote:So, time for me to stop trolling, As you can see by all my previous post there has been plently of posts, evidence, pretending to impersonate etc etc.
This has all been done to prove, that this rule is not likely to be highley enforced as I'm still here, It's at discreation.
Thought I would like to say this toon will probley be banned to prove a point by the GM's.
But stop worrying about this UNTIL it becomes a problem.
I'm out You will die a martyr. |

Le Creed
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
12
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 02:17:00 -
[8] - Quote
Georgina Parmala wrote:
No we would not. Because discussion of moderation is forbidden.
This is a pretty draconian policy that I just learned about today. How are we as players supposed to verify that the moderation team isn't abusing their powers and the Rules/TOS/EULA is being accurately applied to violations.
Sounds like something you would hear about in the Soviet Union, not discussing why your neighbor was imprisoned by the state. |

Le Creed
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
14
|
Posted - 2013.09.13 01:27:00 -
[9] - Quote
This is quite possibly the dumbest thing I have ever heard.
Mama bear CCP has to protect baby carebear though I guess. If more policies like this that interrupt the sandbox in an attempt to make the game more forgiving are implemented, you can kiss my subscirptions goodbye. |

Le Creed
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
17
|
Posted - 2013.09.13 02:20:00 -
[10] - Quote
It's pretty clear we as players don't want this TOS/EULA change so why continue to force it upon us? |
|

Le Creed
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
17
|
Posted - 2013.09.13 02:28:00 -
[11] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Orosono wrote:GM Karidor wrote:To throw the ball back to you: In the hypothetical situation that we were to take no action in such cases, you'd be rather annoyed about Joe once you got wind that he's ruining your hard earned reputation, wouldn't you? Given that such characters as Joe usually don't go about wandering in space very often, you'd have no real recourse of hounding him down until the end of time either. This is true, and absolutely how it should be. I was so hopeful CCP had learned their lesson about screwing with the great parts of the game; it seems I was overly optimistic. Too bad, that's how harsh eve is.
To put it as that song from CCP goes: HTFU. |

Le Creed
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
20
|
Posted - 2013.09.13 03:06:00 -
[12] - Quote
EI Digin wrote:If I was a player with multiple accounts, how am I supposed to say that another character is an alt of mine without breaking the EULA through impersonation or communicating with third party software? From the looks of it, you don't.
Hope that helps. |
|
|
|